Difference between revisions of "Council voting"

From Berkeleypedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(2019 (through May 26))
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Berkeley City Council meetings can be epic in duration and drama.  Five hour meetings are not unusual owing to the ambitious agendas and the extensive public comment sessions.
 
Berkeley City Council meetings can be epic in duration and drama.  Five hour meetings are not unusual owing to the ambitious agendas and the extensive public comment sessions.
  
In the end, council members must cast their votes on the matters before them.   
+
In the end, council members must cast their votes on the matters before them.  How do they use those votes?  What do their voting patterns tell us about the (dis)alignment between individual members?
  
 
== Individual Performance ==
 
== Individual Performance ==
  
 
Council members may vote '''Aye''', '''No''', '''Abstain''', be recorded as '''Absent''', or '''Recuse''' themselves from a particular matter.   
 
Council members may vote '''Aye''', '''No''', '''Abstain''', be recorded as '''Absent''', or '''Recuse''' themselves from a particular matter.   
 +
 +
'''Unanimous votes were excluded from this analysis.'''
  
 
=== How members voted (2019, to date) ===
 
=== How members voted (2019, to date) ===
Line 15: Line 17:
 
!Member!!Aye!!No!!Abstain!!Recuse
 
!Member!!Aye!!No!!Abstain!!Recuse
 
|-
 
|-
|Davila||48||17||11||0
+
|Arreguin||104||6||0||0
 
|-
 
|-
|Arreguin||77||6||0||0
+
|Bartlett||87||5||0||0
 
|-
 
|-
|Robinson||70||12||1||0
+
|Davila||66||22||12||0
 
|-
 
|-
|Kesarwani||73||7||2||0
+
|Droste||73||6||8||0
 
|-
 
|-
|Droste||52||4||7||0
+
|Hahn||98||10||2||0
 
|-
 
|-
|Hahn||73||9||1||0
+
|Harrison||82||14||2||0
 
|-
 
|-
|Harrison||59||13||2||0
+
|Kesarwani||96||8||5||0
 
|-
 
|-
|Bartlett||65||5||0||0
+
|Robinson||93||12||1||0
 
|-
 
|-
|Wengraf||55||14||2||0
+
|Wengraf||64||17||2||0
 
|}
 
|}
  
=== How members voted (2019, through May 26) ===
+
=== How members voted [percentages] (2019, through July 5) ===
  
 
This table shows how members cast their votes as a percentage of their overall voting record.
 
This table shows how members cast their votes as a percentage of their overall voting record.
Line 42: Line 44:
 
!Member!!Aye!!No!!Abstain!!Recuse
 
!Member!!Aye!!No!!Abstain!!Recuse
 
|-
 
|-
|Davila||63.16 %||22.37 %||14.47 %||0.00 %
+
|Arreguin||94.55 %||5.45 %||0.00 %||0.00 %
 
|-
 
|-
|Arreguin||92.77 %||7.23 %||0.00 %||0.00 %
+
|Bartlett||94.57 %||5.43 %||0.00 %||0.00 %
 
|-
 
|-
|Robinson||84.34 %||14.46 %||1.20 %||0.00 %
+
|Davila||66.00 %||22.00 %||12.00 %||0.00 %
 
|-
 
|-
|Kesarwani||89.02 %||8.54 %||2.44 %||0.00 %
+
|Droste||83.91 %||6.90 %||9.20 %||0.00 %
 
|-
 
|-
|Droste||82.54 %||6.35 %||11.11 %||0.00 %
+
|Hahn||89.09 %||9.09 %||1.82 %||0.00 %
 
|-
 
|-
|Hahn||87.95 %||10.84 %||1.20 %||0.00 %
+
|Harrison||83.67 %||14.29 %||2.04 %||0.00 %
 
|-
 
|-
|Harrison||79.73 %||17.57 %||2.70 %||0.00 %
+
|Kesarwani||88.07 %||7.34 %||4.59 %||0.00 %
 
|-
 
|-
|Bartlett||92.86 %||7.14 %||0.00 %||0.00 %
+
|Robinson||87.74 %||11.32 %||0.94 %||0.00 %
 
|-
 
|-
|Wengraf||77.46 %||19.72 %||2.82 %||0.00 %
+
|Wengraf||77.11 %||20.48 %||2.41 %||0.00 %
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 73: Line 75:
 
* '''Unanimous votes are ignored''' since these have no explanatory power with regard to intra-council dynamics
 
* '''Unanimous votes are ignored''' since these have no explanatory power with regard to intra-council dynamics
  
=== 2019 (through May 26) ===
+
Higher numbers (greener cells) indicate that the two members are more closely aligned;  negative numbers (more red) signal opposing views.
  
[[File:Council-Voting-2019.png|center]]
+
=== 2019 (through July 5) ===
 +
 
 +
[[File:Council-Voting-2019.png||center]]
  
 
=== 2018 ===
 
=== 2018 ===
  
[[File:Council-Voting-2018.png|thumb|center]]
+
Caveat: Robinson and Kesarwani were only in office for one meeting and so their data should be ignored.
 +
 
 +
[[File:Council-Voting-2018.png||center]]

Latest revision as of 07:14, 5 July 2019

Berkeley City Council meetings can be epic in duration and drama. Five hour meetings are not unusual owing to the ambitious agendas and the extensive public comment sessions.

In the end, council members must cast their votes on the matters before them. How do they use those votes? What do their voting patterns tell us about the (dis)alignment between individual members?

Individual Performance

Council members may vote Aye, No, Abstain, be recorded as Absent, or Recuse themselves from a particular matter.

Unanimous votes were excluded from this analysis.

How members voted (2019, to date)

This is a straight count of votes cast by members who were not absent.

Member Aye No Abstain Recuse
Arreguin 104 6 0 0
Bartlett 87 5 0 0
Davila 66 22 12 0
Droste 73 6 8 0
Hahn 98 10 2 0
Harrison 82 14 2 0
Kesarwani 96 8 5 0
Robinson 93 12 1 0
Wengraf 64 17 2 0

How members voted [percentages] (2019, through July 5)

This table shows how members cast their votes as a percentage of their overall voting record.

Member Aye No Abstain Recuse
Arreguin 94.55 % 5.45 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
Bartlett 94.57 % 5.43 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
Davila 66.00 % 22.00 % 12.00 % 0.00 %
Droste 83.91 % 6.90 % 9.20 % 0.00 %
Hahn 89.09 % 9.09 % 1.82 % 0.00 %
Harrison 83.67 % 14.29 % 2.04 % 0.00 %
Kesarwani 88.07 % 7.34 % 4.59 % 0.00 %
Robinson 87.74 % 11.32 % 0.94 % 0.00 %
Wengraf 77.11 % 20.48 % 2.41 % 0.00 %

Voting Correlation

Berkeley voters with limited time for lobbying may wish to concentrate their efforts with the members who are most likely to support their interests.

These charts depict the correlation between members across all votes in a calendar year. These are created as follows:

  • A vote is recorded for each member;
  • Each "aye" is scored as "1"
  • Each "no" is scored as "-1"
  • Abstentions are scored as "0"
  • Unanimous votes are ignored since these have no explanatory power with regard to intra-council dynamics

Higher numbers (greener cells) indicate that the two members are more closely aligned; negative numbers (more red) signal opposing views.

2019 (through July 5)

Council-Voting-2019.png

2018

Caveat: Robinson and Kesarwani were only in office for one meeting and so their data should be ignored.

Council-Voting-2018.png